Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTCCX vs FWWMX
DTCCX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts DTCCX vs FWWMX
DTCCX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. DTCCX (515M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than DTCCX: FWWMX (1.44) vs DTCCX (0.00). DTCCX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: DTCCX (27 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). DTCCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. DTCCX (27.23). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTCCX: FWWMX (250) vs DTCCX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. DTCCX (2.01). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.72 vs. DTCCX (0.96).
| DTCCX | FWWMX | DTCCX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.31 | 548% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.31 | 600% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.793 | 3.208 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 515M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 6.18 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 29.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.96 | 29.72 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement