Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTCYX vs FWWMX
DTCYX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts DTCYX vs FWWMX
DTCYX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. DTCYX (523M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than DTCYX: FWWMX (1.40) vs DTCYX (0.19). DTCYX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: DTCYX (10 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). DTCYX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. DTCYX (27.23). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTCYX: FWWMX (250) vs DTCYX (1000000). DTCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. FWWMX (8.56). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.95 vs. DTCYX (22.68).
| DTCYX | FWWMX | DTCYX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.31 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.526 | 2.079 | 410% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 8.56 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 24.40 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.68 | 32.95 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement