Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTGRX vs FSCSX
DTGRX vs FSCSX Comparison
Open Charts DTGRX vs FSCSX
DTGRX vs FSCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTGRX vs. FSCSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTGRX is a Buy and FSCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCSX has more cash in the bank: 7.86B vs. DTGRX (538M). DTGRX (0.00) and FSCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . DTGRX was incepted earlier than FSCSX: DTGRX (29 years) vs FSCSX (41 years). DTGRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSCSX (0.61). FSCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. DTGRX (33.84). FSCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTGRX: FSCSX (0) vs DTGRX (1000). DTGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.00 vs. FSCSX (-19.40). DTGRX return over 5 years is better than : 18.37 vs. FSCSX (-26.80).
| DTGRX | FSCSX | DTGRX / FSCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.61 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.61 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.747 | -8.284 | -287% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 538M | 7.86B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.00 | -19.40 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.84 | -11.95 | -777% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.37 | -26.80 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.62 | 76.15 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement