DULL
Price
$67.88
Change
+$0.12 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
2.02M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLL
Price
$24.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
122.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DULL vs GLL

Header iconDULL vs GLL Comparison
Open Charts DULL vs GLLBanner chart's image
DULL vs GLL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (DULL) vs. ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL)

Key Takeaways

  • Both DULL and GLL provide inverse exposure to gold prices, with DULL targeting -3x daily performance of the GLD ETF (which tracks physical gold bullion) and GLL seeking -2x the daily performance of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (gold futures).
  • DULL, as an exchange-traded note (ETN), carries issuer credit risk from Bank of Montreal, while GLL is a traditional ETF structured as a commodity pool with no such senior unsecured debt obligation.
  • Expense ratios are identical at 0.95%, but GLL demonstrates superior liquidity with approximately $100 million in assets under management (AUM) and average daily volumes exceeding 3 million shares, compared to DULL's $14 million AUM and lower trading activity.
  • Both employ daily rebalancing, amplifying volatility and making them suitable for short-term tactical trades rather than long-term holds due to compounding effects.
  • In recent market cycles dominated by gold price surges amid geopolitical tensions and central bank buying, both have experienced significant drawdowns, with DULL's higher leverage leading to more pronounced losses.
  • GLL offers options trading availability, enhancing hedging flexibility for sophisticated investors.

Introduction

In the current market environment, gold has surged to record highs above $5,000 per ounce, driven by persistent geopolitical risks, central bank diversification into precious metals, and expectations of sustained inflation. Inverse gold products like DULL and GLL provide tactical opportunities for investors bearish on further upside or seeking to hedge long gold positions. While both deliver leveraged short exposure to gold, they differ in leverage multiples, underlying benchmarks, and structural risks, appealing to traders navigating gold's elevated volatility. This comparison highlights their distinct profiles for short-term positioning amid broader commodity trends.

MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (DULL) Overview

The MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (DULL), issued by Bank of Montreal, is an exchange-traded note designed to provide three times the inverse (-3x) daily performance of the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF, which holds physical gold bullion and tracks the LBMA Gold Price, minus fees. As an ETN, DULL is a senior unsecured debt obligation of the issuer, introducing credit risk tied to Bank of Montreal's financial health.

It has a single "holding" effectively linked to GLD (100% weight), with no direct physical gold ownership. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. This passive, leveraged inverse strategy resets daily through compounding, amplifying returns (or losses) from gold price moves. Key distinguishing features include a long maturity date of January 29, 2043, issuer call rights, and minimum redemption of 25,000 units. Liquidity is modest, with around $14 million AUM and average daily volume near 30,000 shares, traded on NYSE Arca.

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) Overview

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex SM, which measures gold prices via COMEX gold futures contracts on a rolling basis. Issued by ProShares as a commodity pool ETF under the Commodity Exchange Act, it invests in derivatives like swaps and futures rather than physical gold.

Top exposures include swaps with Citibank NA (-58.86%), UBS AG (-16.17%), and Goldman Sachs (-10.45%), alongside gold futures contracts, with net cash balancing the portfolio. Number of holdings is limited to a handful of derivatives. The expense ratio is 0.95%. This passive strategy rebalances daily to maintain -2x leverage. Notable features include options availability and no issuer credit risk inherent to ETNs. Liquidity is robust, with about $100 million AUM and average daily volumes over 3 million shares on NYSE Arca.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold market has experienced robust demand in recent cycles, fueled by central bank purchases exceeding 800 tonnes annually, de-dollarization efforts by emerging markets, and investor flight to safe-haven assets amid geopolitical conflicts and fiscal concerns. Elevated prices near $4,800–$5,000 per ounce reflect persistent inflation, potential Federal Reserve rate pauses, and ETF inflows surpassing $89 billion last year. Regulatory scrutiny on commodities remains stable, but volatility has spiked, with intra-year swings exceeding 14% tied to U.S. dollar strength and futures positioning. Sector risks include opportunity costs from rising yields and speculative unwinds, positioning inverse products for hedging during corrections within the structural uptrend.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, gold's rally—hitting all-time highs above $5,500 before correcting—has pressured both DULL and GLL, with relative performance tied to leverage intensity. DULL's -3x target has amplified losses amid upward gold trends influenced by geopolitical escalations and central bank flows, exhibiting higher volatility than GLL's -2x exposure. GLL, benchmarked to futures, has shown similar drawdowns but with moderated swings due to lower leverage, benefiting from tighter bid-ask spreads. Both diverge from physical gold trackers like GLD in prolonged uptrends, where compounding erodes returns. Positioning favors short-term bearish bets on pullbacks driven by dollar rebounds or risk-on rotations, with DULL suiting aggressive trades and GLL offering balanced volatility exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including leveraged inverse products like those targeting commodities. Explore the AI Screener to uncover potential edges in volatile sectors today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors GLL over DULL, with approximately 60% probability in short-term tactical setups. This assessment stems from GLL's superior liquidity profile, established track record since 2008, absence of ETN-specific credit risk, and options availability, alongside balanced -2x leverage amid gold's momentum. While DULL's higher -3x multiple offers greater upside in sharp declines, its lower AUM and nascent status (launched 2023) elevate execution risks. Favor GLL for consistent trend hedging; monitor for gold corrections exceeding 10%.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DULL vs. GLL commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DULL is a Buy and GLL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLL has more net assets: 123M vs. DULL (2.02M). GLL has a higher annual dividend yield than DULL: GLL (-5.468) vs DULL (-19.190). DULL was incepted earlier than GLL: DULL (3 years) vs GLL (18 years).
DULLGLLDULL / GLL
Gain YTD-19.190-5.468351%
Net Assets2.02M123M2%
Total Expense RatioN/A1.26-
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence3 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DULLGLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DULL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSME1.690.58
+52.25%
VS Media Holdings Limited
NRIM25.800.28
+1.10%
Northrim BanCorp
BEN32.130.32
+1.01%
Franklin Resources
FSLY18.55-0.33
-1.75%
Fastly
ONCY0.80-0.02
-2.07%
Oncolytics Biotech

DULL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DULL and P have been poorly correlated (+-12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DULL and P's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DULL
1D Price
Change %
DULL100%
+0.18%
P - DULL
-12%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
FR - DULL
-17%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
SSRM - DULL
-66%
Negatively correlated
+3.46%
CDE - DULL
-69%
Negatively correlated
+4.88%
AGI - DULL
-74%
Negatively correlated
+2.06%
More