Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DWGFX vs RNWFX
DWGFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts DWGFX vs RNWFX
DWGFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DWGFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DWGFX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. DWGFX (2.73B). DWGFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: DWGFX (1.70) vs RNWFX (1.20). DWGFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: DWGFX (12 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). DWGFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). DWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). DWGFX (250) and RNWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.96 vs. RNWFX (22.14). DWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.60 vs. RNWFX (15.23).
| DWGFX | RNWFX | DWGFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.957 | 14.464 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 90.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.20 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.96 | 22.14 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.17 | 51.35 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.60 | 15.23 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.30 | 126.01 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement