Specialty contractors serving telecommunications, utilities, and electrical infrastructure represent a focused segment of the industrials sector. DY (Dycom Industries, Inc.) and MYRG (MYR Group Inc.) both provide essential construction and maintenance services in this space, making them relevant benchmarks for investors tracking infrastructure-related equities. This comparison appeals to traders monitoring relative performance, sector rotation, and momentum signals within engineering and construction. It also offers context for those evaluating how two companies with overlapping end markets have responded to recent macroeconomic and industry-specific conditions.
Dycom Industries, Inc. provides specialty contracting services primarily to the telecommunications infrastructure and utility industries across the United States. The company focuses on engineering, construction, and maintenance projects supporting digital and power networks. In recent market activity, DY has traded in a range influenced by broader infrastructure spending trends and investor positioning ahead of earnings. The stock has exhibited measured movements amid sector volatility, with attention centered on upcoming fiscal 2027 first-quarter results scheduled for release on May 27, 2026. Sentiment reflects anticipation around contract backlogs and execution in a capital-intensive environment.
MYR Group Inc. delivers electrical construction services through two main segments: Transmission and Distribution, and Commercial and Industrial. Operations span the United States and Canada, with emphasis on utility networks, substations, and related infrastructure. In recent weeks, MYRG has demonstrated notable price appreciation, including a 31.72% advance over the past month and a 183.91% gain over the trailing year. The company reported a strong earnings beat for Q1 2026, with EPS of $2.99 versus expectations of $2.06. Performance has been supported by robust project activity and favorable positioning in high-demand areas such as grid modernization.
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights select AI trading bots from its broader library of hundreds of automated strategies. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across equities, with only the strongest performers and those best aligned with prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, allowing users to review detailed statistics before any engagement. The platform provides transparent data on historical results and parameters to support informed evaluation. Investors seeking algorithmic insights may visit the Trending AI Robots page for additional context on current market dynamics.
DY and MYRG share exposure to utility and infrastructure end markets yet differ in emphasis. DY maintains a stronger telecommunications focus alongside utility work, while MYRG allocates significant resources to transmission, distribution, and commercial electrical projects. Recent momentum has favored MYRG, evidenced by outsized gains and an earnings beat, contrasting with DY’s more measured price behavior ahead of its earnings release. Both face execution risks tied to project timing, labor availability, and material costs. MYRG has shown greater price volatility paired with higher recent returns, whereas DY offers a profile potentially aligned with steadier contract flows in telecom infrastructure. Market sentiment for the pair remains tied to sustained capital expenditure in power and digital networks.
Based on observable trend consistency and recent performance differentials, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to MYRG. Factors supporting this assessment include stronger price momentum, a notable earnings beat, and sustained gains over multiple timeframes. DY presents a more balanced but less dynamic profile pending its upcoming results. The assessment reflects relative positioning rather than absolute outcomes and remains subject to evolving market data.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMYRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MYRG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +8.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.09%.
DY is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| DY | MYRG | DY / MYRG | |
| Capitalization | 13.7B | 7.18B | 191% |
| EBITDA | 807M | 266M | 303% |
| Gain YTD | 35.144 | 111.030 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.62 | 50.80 | 86% |
| Revenue | 6.25B | 3.83B | 163% |
| Total Cash | 539M | 163M | 331% |
| Total Debt | 3B | 61.5M | 4,876% |
DY | MYRG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DY's Valuation (79) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (80). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (8). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's SMR Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (46). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (39). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MYRG (84). This means that DY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| DY | MYRG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BEL.X | 0.114391 | 0.011937 | +11.65% |
| Bella Protocol cryptocurrency | |||
| GMT.X | 0.007961 | 0.000203 | +2.62% |
| GMT cryptocurrency | |||
| FTT.X | 0.261561 | 0.002837 | +1.10% |
| FTX Token cryptocurrency | |||
| HBAR.X | 0.080484 | 0.000290 | +0.36% |
| Hedera cryptocurrency | |||
| UNFI.X | 0.018446 | -0.000230 | -1.23% |
| Unifi Protocol DAO cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYRG | 100% | +3.76% | ||
| PWR - MYRG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| MTZ - MYRG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| FIX - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| EME - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| IESC - MYRG | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.97% | ||
More | ||||