MYRG
Price
$407.40
Change
-$1.67 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.34B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$653.80
Change
+$10.66 (+1.66%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
98.11B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MYRG vs PWR

MYRG vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? MYR Group (MYRG) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MYR Group (MYRG) and Quanta Services (PWR) both operate in the electrical infrastructure and specialty contracting space, yet they differ significantly in scale, diversification, and market positioning.
  • Recent market activity has seen Quanta Services benefit from stronger momentum tied to large-scale grid modernization and renewable energy transmission projects, while MYR Group has faced headwinds related to project delays and cost pressures.
  • MYRG's more concentrated revenue base in transmission and distribution (T&D) makes it more sensitive to utility capex cycles, whereas PWR's broader portfolio provides greater earnings resilience.
  • Valuation metrics diverge notably, with PWR commanding a premium multiple reflecting its scale advantages and consistent execution, while MYRG trades at a relative discount that may attract value-oriented investors.
  • Institutional sentiment has leaned more favorably toward PWR in recent weeks, supported by stronger earnings revisions and a more diversified backlog of infrastructure projects.
  • Both companies stand to benefit from secular tailwinds in electrification and grid hardening, but their risk-reward profiles differ meaningfully in the current market environment.

Introduction

Investors navigating the electrical infrastructure and utility services sector frequently encounter two names: MYRG (MYR Group Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.). Both companies are positioned to capture demand from aging grid infrastructure, renewable energy expansion, and growing electricity consumption. Yet beneath the surface, these two specialty contractors diverge in scale, business mix, and recent stock behavior. This comparison is relevant for investors seeking exposure to secular infrastructure trends while weighing trade-offs between higher-growth momentum and potential value opportunities. Understanding how MYRG and PWR stack up against each other can help clarify which name aligns more closely with different investment objectives in today's evolving market landscape.

MYRG Overview and Recent Performance

MYR Group Inc., headquartered in Henderson, Colorado, is a leading specialty electrical contractor serving the transmission and distribution (T&D) and commercial and industrial (C&I) markets across the United States and Canada. The company derives the majority of its revenue from T&D projects, including the construction and maintenance of high-voltage power lines, substations, and related infrastructure for investor-owned utilities and cooperatives. Its C&I segment focuses on electrical contracting for data centers, healthcare facilities, airports, and renewable energy installations.

In recent weeks, MYRG has experienced choppy trading conditions. The stock has faced downward pressure following its most recent quarterly earnings release, which revealed margin compression in its T&D segment driven by project delays and higher labor costs. Revenue growth has remained positive but decelerated relative to prior periods, prompting analysts to modestly revise earnings estimates lower. The company's backlog, while historically robust, has shown signs of lumpiness as certain large-scale transmission projects encounter regulatory and permitting uncertainties. On a constructive note, MYR Group's exposure to data center construction has provided a partial offset, and its balance sheet remains conservative with manageable leverage. Broader market sentiment toward mid-cap industrial names, combined with sector rotation, has contributed to relative underperformance versus larger peers over recent months.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

Quanta Services, Inc., based in Houston, Texas, is one of the largest specialty infrastructure solutions providers in North America, with operations spanning electric power, pipeline, industrial, and communications sectors. The company's electric power segment encompasses grid modernization, renewable energy transmission, and substation engineering, while its pipeline and industrial segment serves the energy midstream and downstream markets. Quanta's scale and diversification have historically allowed it to weather cyclical shifts better than smaller competitors.

Recent trading activity in PWR has reflected broadly positive momentum. The company delivered quarterly results that exceeded consensus expectations, with both revenue and earnings per share (EPS) surpassing analyst forecasts. Management raised full-year guidance, citing accelerating demand for grid hardening, renewable interconnections, and electrification projects tied to data center load growth. The company's record backlog, which now stretches into multiple years of visible revenue, has reinforced investor confidence. Quanta's strategic acquisitions have expanded its capabilities in underground transmission and communications infrastructure, further diversifying revenue streams. Compared to the broader industrials sector, PWR has demonstrated relative strength, supported by institutional accumulation and favorable sell-side commentary. While not immune to macroeconomic uncertainty, the company's scale and end-market breadth have made it a preferred vehicle for investors seeking infrastructure exposure with lower single-project concentration risk.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking data-driven insights beyond traditional stock comparisons, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each employing distinct trading styles, strategies, and timeframes. The Trending AI Robots section highlights only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics, with some bots showcasing annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 60%, depending on strategy and risk parameters. These bots analyze technical patterns, momentum signals, and volatility metrics to execute trades autonomously, offering traders a hands-free approach to market participation. Whether you favor short-term swing trading or longer-term trend following, exploring the curated Trending AI Robots page can help you identify automated strategies that complement your investment approach.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing MYRG and PWR directly, several structural differences emerge. In terms of scale, Quanta Services operates as a large-cap industry leader with a market capitalization roughly seven to eight times that of MYR Group, providing advantages in bidding capacity, supplier relationships, and geographic reach. This scale translates into a more diversified backlog, reducing reliance on any single project or utility client.

On growth drivers, both companies benefit from grid modernization and renewable energy trends, but PWR's broader exposure to midstream energy infrastructure and communications networks provides additional growth levers that MYRG lacks. Conversely, MYRG's higher concentration in T&D means it is more leveraged to transmission capex cycles — a double-edged sword that can amplify both upside and downside depending on utility spending patterns.

Recent momentum favors PWR, which has posted stronger earnings beats, raised guidance, and benefited from upward analyst revisions. MYRG has faced modest estimate cuts and margin concerns, contributing to a relative performance gap. Risk factors differ as well: MYRG's smaller project portfolio makes it more vulnerable to individual contract delays or cost overruns, while PWR faces integration risks from its acquisition strategy and potential cyclical pressure in its pipeline segment.

From a valuation standpoint, PWR trades at a premium on both price-to-earnings (P/E) and enterprise-value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) bases, reflecting its superior execution and scale. MYRG's discounted valuation may appeal to contrarian or value-oriented investors, but it also reflects market skepticism about near-term earnings visibility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analysis would likely favor PWR in the current environment. The combination of stronger earnings momentum, upward guidance revisions, a record and diversified backlog, and more favorable institutional sentiment provides a compelling set of catalysts that trend-following algorithms tend to prioritize. PWR's lower volatility relative to the sector and consistent outperformance against moving averages further support a probability-weighted preference. That said, MYRG could become more attractive to AI-driven models if margin pressures ease, backlog conversion accelerates, or valuation metrics reach levels that trigger mean-reversion signals. The AI assessment reflects a probabilistic evaluation of current trends rather than a definitive forecast, underscoring the importance of monitoring both names as market conditions evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
MYRG vs. PWR commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MYRG is a Hold and PWR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (MYRG: $407.40 vs. PWR: $653.80)
Brand notoriety: MYRG and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MYRG: 67% vs. PWR: 74%
Market capitalization -- MYRG: $6.34B vs. PWR: $98.11B
MYRG [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.34B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $98.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MYRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MYRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than MYRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MYRG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MYRG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than MYRG.

Price Growth

MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.15% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.23% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($98.1B) has a higher market cap than MYRG($6.34B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than MYRG: PWR (89.68) vs MYRG (44.92). MYRG YTD gains are higher at: 86.453 vs. PWR (55.001). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. MYRG (266M). PWR has more cash in the bank: 250M vs. MYRG (163M). MYRG has less debt than PWR: MYRG (61.5M) vs PWR (6.32B). PWR has higher revenues than MYRG: PWR (30.1B) vs MYRG (3.83B).
MYRGPWRMYRG / PWR
Capitalization6.34B98.1B6%
EBITDA266M2.71B10%
Gain YTD86.45355.001157%
P/E Ratio44.9289.6850%
Revenue3.83B30.1B13%
Total Cash163M250M65%
Total Debt61.5M6.32B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MYRG vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
MYRG
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5410
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
126
SMR RATING
1..100
4263
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MYRG's Valuation (79) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (88). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (12). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.

MYRG's SMR Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (63). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

MYRG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (45). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MYRG (92). This means that PWR’s stock grew significantly faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MYRGPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MYRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHR192.5013.36
+7.46%
Danaher Corp
ATLO29.790.31
+1.05%
Ames National Corp
MYRG407.40-1.67
-0.41%
MYR Group
TOP2.18-0.09
-3.96%
TOP Financial Group Limited
TVRD2.56-0.20
-7.25%
Tvardi Therapeutics Inc