Advertisement
MYRG vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MYR Group (MYRG) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both companies operate in electrical infrastructure construction, but MYRG is a mid-cap specialty contractor while PWR is the largest North American infrastructure services firm by market capitalization.
- MYR Group has delivered record revenue and backlog growth, while Quanta Services posted net income growth of nearly 97% year over year in its most recent quarter.
- Quanta's roughly $53 billion backlog and broader scale contrast with MYR Group's more focused transmission, distribution, and commercial-and-industrial (C&I) footprint.
- Valuation profiles differ sharply: MYRG trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple, while PWR carries a substantial premium reflecting its growth expectations.
- Both stocks have recently pulled back from highs despite strong year-to-date gains, underscoring volatility in the sector.
Introduction
Electrical infrastructure and power grid modernization are among the most closely watched investment themes of the current cycle, driven by aging grids, electrification, and surging data center power demand. This stock comparison examines two participants positioned on that theme: MYRG, a specialty electrical construction contractor, and PWR, the sector's largest integrated infrastructure solutions provider. Investors seeking exposure to utility spending, energy transition, and grid upgrades may find this relative performance review useful, whether they favor the focused, mid-cap profile of MYR Group or the diversified scale of Quanta Services. Understanding their market positioning, momentum, and risk trade-offs can inform a more balanced assessment.
MYRG Overview and Recent Performance
MYR Group, Inc. (MYRG) is a specialty electrical construction holding company serving two segments: Transmission and Distribution (T&D) and Commercial and Industrial (C&I). The company provides design, engineering, and construction services for electric transmission and distribution networks, substations, data centers, transportation, and healthcare facilities across the United States and Canada. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced notable volatility, pulling back from a 52-week high after a strong rally earlier in the year. In its most recent quarter, the company reported record revenue of roughly $1.08 billion and a record backlog of approximately $3.16 billion, reflecting sustained demand and margin improvement. Recent market activity has been shaped by acquisitions expanding its C&I capabilities, analyst estimate revisions, and broader sector sentiment. While execution on existing contracts has been strong, investors have weighed factors such as competitive pressure from larger peers and valuation after a sharp run-up.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is the largest specialty contractor in North America, providing infrastructure solutions across electric and gas utilities, power generation, load centers, manufacturing, and communications. Its scale, skilled workforce, and diversified "total solutions" model allow it to execute large, complex grid and energy programs. Recent market activity has been similarly mixed, with the stock cooling after a multi-year run despite strong year-to-date gains. In its latest quarterly report, Quanta's revenue rose about 41% year over year to roughly $9.56 billion, while net income attributable to common stock nearly doubled to approximately $451 million. A backlog of around $53 billion, much of it tied to grid modernization and AI-driven power demand, provides extended revenue visibility. Analysts have broadly maintained positive ratings, with several firms recently raising price targets, though valuation remains a focal point given the stock's elevated multiples.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a systematic way to monitor momentum and relative positioning across names like MYRG and PWR, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of AI-driven trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots vary considerably in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance, and the sets of tickers they trade, with some reporting track records spanning hundreds of completed trades and measurable win rates. Because each bot is tuned differently, the page can help investors identify automated approaches aligned with their own objectives. Exploring the Trending AI Robots section is a practical way to observe how quantitative models are interpreting the same market signals discussed here.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two names is scale and diversification. PWR operates with a market capitalization roughly 20 times larger than MYRG, spanning multiple infrastructure verticals, while MYR Group remains a focused electrical contractor. Growth drivers overlap on grid investment and data centers, but Quanta's breadth gives it exposure to gas utilities, pipelines, and renewable generation that MYRG does not share to the same degree. On momentum, both have delivered strong year-to-date returns followed by recent pullbacks, indicating that near-term sentiment has cooled despite solid fundamentals. Risk profiles differ as well: MYR Group's smaller backlog and thinner gross margins make it more sensitive to project execution and competitive bidding, while Quanta's premium valuation leaves less margin for error if growth expectations moderate. From a market positioning standpoint, Quanta offers diversified visibility, whereas MYR Group offers a more direct, higher-beta play on electrical construction demand.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PWR in the current environment. Quanta Services combines a larger and more diversified backlog, stronger earnings momentum, and more consistent analyst support, all of which tend to align with sustained trend signals. Its greater scale also reduces single-project risk relative to MYR Group's more concentrated business. However, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive prediction: MYRG offers a lower valuation and could exhibit sharper upside if execution and backlog conversion continue to improve. The AI's preference reflects a balance of momentum, diversification, and visibility, with Quanta's broader positioning currently appearing more resilient across multiple market scenarios.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MYRG is a Hold and PWR is a Buy.
MYRG | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYRG's Valuation (73) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (86). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MYRG (50). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's SMR Rating (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (47). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MYRG (84). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| MYRG | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MYRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- MYRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MYRG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MYRG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +3.48% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.91% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
MYRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYRG | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| PWR - MYRG | 76% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| FIX - MYRG | 75% Closely correlated | -4.53% | ||
| EME - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| ECG - MYRG | 67% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| STRL - MYRG | 67% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||