This stock comparison examines MYRG and PWR, two leaders in electrical construction and infrastructure services. Both operate in the high-demand sectors of transmission and distribution, benefiting from utility grid upgrades, data center expansions, and renewable energy integration. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors focused on long-term infrastructure growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, business models, and market positioning. Recent quarters highlight robust revenue growth and backlog visibility amid broader electrification trends, making this head-to-head relevant for evaluating sector opportunities.
MYRG, or MYR Group Inc., is a holding company providing electrical construction services through subsidiaries in the U.S. and Canada. It operates in two segments: Transmission and Distribution (T&D), focusing on high-voltage lines, substations, and clean energy projects; and Commercial and Industrial (C&I), serving data centers, airports, and manufacturing facilities.
In recent market activity, MYRG shares have surged, hitting new 52-week highs around $456 amid strong Q1 2026 results. Revenue reached a record $1 billion, up 20% year-over-year, with gross margins expanding to 13.4% from 11.6%. Net income hit $46.8 million, or $2.99 per diluted share, beating estimates. Backlog grew to a record $2.84 billion, supported by T&D master service agreements (about 70% of segment revenue) and C&I data center demand. Sentiment has shifted positively on margin improvements from better project mix, prefabrication, and productivity gains, though offset somewhat by inefficiencies on select jobs. Year-to-date returns exceed 108%, outpacing the S&P 500.
PWR, or Quanta Services Inc., delivers comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, pipelines, and energy sectors. With over 200 acquisitions, it serves utilities, data centers, and industrial clients across North America.
Recent weeks have seen PWR shares advance, trading near $771 with year-to-date gains of 82%. Q1 2026 revenue climbed 26% to $7.87 billion, surpassing estimates, while adjusted EPS rose 50% to $2.68. Remaining performance obligations stood at $26.2 billion, underscoring visibility. Management raised full-year outlook, citing execution across segments, utility demand, and data center growth. Performance reflects solid margins and a solutions-based model with skilled workforce, though free cash flow remains a watch point. The stock's stability and scale have driven multi-year outperformance versus benchmarks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots, numbering 25, are chosen for their suitability to current market conditions, featuring annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors ranging from 1.5 to 11.7. Strategies vary by timeframe (e.g., 5min, 15min, 60min), including trend trading, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors, targeting sectors like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and leveraged ETFs. Examples include a multi-agent bot on USAR/SMR/CIFR with +169% annualized return and 75% win rate, or semiconductor plays like LRCX/TER yielding +95%. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge.
MYRG and PWR share core exposure to electrical infrastructure but differ in scale and diversification. PWR's $115 billion market cap dwarfs MYRG's $7 billion, with annual revenue near $30 billion versus $3.6 billion, enabling broader pipelines, renewables, and communications work. Growth drivers align on grid modernization and data centers, but MYRG emphasizes T&D (57% revenue) and C&I, while PWR offers multi-segment resilience.
Recent momentum favors MYRG (195% one-year return vs. 139%), with post-Q1 surges, but PWR shows steadier multi-year gains. Risks include execution on complex projects, labor constraints, and cost inflation for both; MYRG faces lumpier C&I backlog volatility, while PWR contends with cash flow pressures. Market sentiment tilts to infrastructure tailwinds, with trade-offs in growth potential versus stability.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MYRG over PWR, based on superior recent trend consistency, relative outperformance (e.g., 108% YTD vs. 82%), and accelerating catalysts like record backlog growth and margin expansion in T&D and data centers. While PWR provides greater scale and diversification, MYRG's momentum suggests higher probability of near-term upside in bullish infrastructure conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MYRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MYRG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.83% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.23%.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MYRG | PWR | MYRG / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 7.09B | 115B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 266M | 2.71B | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 108.362 | 81.529 | 133% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.20 | 105.05 | 48% |
| Revenue | 3.83B | 30.1B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 163M | 365M | 45% |
| Total Debt | 61.5M | 6.32B | 1% |
MYRG | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYRG's Valuation (84) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (92). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (5). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's SMR Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (60). This means that MYRG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (35). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MYRG (83). This means that PWR’s stock grew significantly faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| MYRG | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYRG | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| PWR - MYRG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| MTZ - MYRG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| EME - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| STRL - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| FIX - MYRG | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||