Advertisement
DY vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dycom Industries (DY) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Dycom Industries (DY) and Quanta Services (PWR) operate in infrastructure services, with DY focused on telecommunications and PWR on broader electric power and energy infrastructure.
- Recent market activity shows PWR benefiting from a strong second-quarter 2026 earnings beat and raised full-year guidance, while DY prepares for its fiscal second-quarter results later this month.
- Year-to-date performance through mid-August 2026 indicates PWR with approximately 52% returns compared to DY's roughly 18%, reflecting differing momentum in recent weeks.
- Both companies report elevated backlogs and exposure to infrastructure spending trends, though PWR's larger scale and diversification provide broader sector coverage.
- Market sentiment for PWR has been supported by analyst upgrades following operational execution, whereas DY has seen board expansion and steady analyst attention ahead of earnings.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs in growth visibility, with PWR demonstrating more immediate catalysts from recent results and DY offering potential from upcoming disclosures.
Introduction
This comparison examines Dycom Industries (DY) and Quanta Services (PWR), two publicly traded companies in the specialty contracting and infrastructure services sector. Both firms provide essential services supporting telecommunications networks, electric power transmission, and related energy projects, making them relevant to investors tracking infrastructure spending, grid modernization, and digital connectivity trends. Traders and investors focused on relative performance, sector positioning, and recent momentum may find the analysis useful for understanding how these stocks have responded to broader market conditions over recent weeks and months. The review draws on verifiable developments to highlight contrasts in business scale, earnings visibility, and market reactions without forward-looking speculation.
DY Overview and Recent Performance
Dycom Industries (DY) delivers specialty contracting services primarily for telecommunications infrastructure, including the installation and maintenance of fiber optic networks and wireless facilities. In recent market activity, the stock has traded in a range near $390 to $410, reflecting measured responses to sector demand and operational updates. Year-to-date returns through mid-August 2026 stood at approximately 18%, underperforming broader market benchmarks in some periods amid fluctuating trading volumes. Key developments include the August 4 appointment of two new board members with finance expertise, expanding the board to eleven directors. The company is scheduled to report fiscal 2027 second-quarter results on August 26, with analysts projecting continued earnings growth from prior periods. Sentiment has remained stable ahead of the earnings release, supported by expectations of sustained infrastructure project activity.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services (PWR) provides infrastructure solutions across electric power, renewable energy, and underground utility segments, serving a diversified client base. Recent market activity has featured notable volatility, with the stock trading around $640 to $690 levels following its second-quarter report. Year-to-date returns through mid-August reached approximately 52%, outpacing many peers amid strong operational execution. The company delivered record second-quarter 2026 results with revenue of $9.56 billion, adjusted earnings per share of $4.24, and a backlog reaching $53.4 billion, prompting a significant upward revision to full-year 2026 guidance. Additional positive sentiment stemmed from analyst rating upgrades citing execution strength. Recent price movements included periods of pullback, yet overall positioning benefited from elevated visibility into energy infrastructure projects.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights select AI trading bots from a broader library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, including consistent trend capture, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability across timeframes, earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse strategies, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical statistics often showing ranges of annualized returns, win rates, and drawdown profiles that vary by bot type and market regime. Users can review detailed performance data, strategy descriptions, and suitability indicators directly on the platform. For additional insights into current trending options, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, Dycom Industries (DY) maintains a narrower focus on telecommunications infrastructure compared to Quanta Services (PWR)'s broader exposure to electric power, renewables, and related energy projects. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with PWR benefiting from larger-scale utility and grid initiatives while DY tracks telecom network expansions. Recent momentum has favored PWR following its earnings beat and guidance increase, contrasting with DY's more measured price action ahead of its upcoming report. Risk factors include execution variability on large projects for both, though PWR's greater scale may introduce different operational complexities. Sector exposure positions PWR with wider sensitivity to energy transition spending, while DY aligns more closely with digital infrastructure demand. Market sentiment has reflected these distinctions, with PWR attracting more immediate analyst attention and DY maintaining steady pre-earnings positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, backlog visibility, and relative price stability in the current environment, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a higher probabilistic weighting to Quanta Services (PWR) over Dycom Industries (DY) at this time. PWR’s demonstrated revenue and earnings beats, combined with upgraded guidance and analyst support, contribute to stronger trend alignment signals. DY shows solid positioning ahead of its earnings release but exhibits comparatively less immediate catalyst momentum in recent weeks. These assessments remain probabilistic and tied to available data patterns rather than definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DY is a Hold and PWR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
DY is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.76% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| DY | PWR | DY / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 8.91B | 93.2B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 807M | 3.08B | 26% |
| Gain YTD | -12.530 | 47.002 | -27% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.99 | 70.95 | 38% |
| Revenue | 6.25B | 32.9B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 539M | 506M | 107% |
| Total Debt | 3B | 6.6B | 45% |
DY | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DY's Valuation (70) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (85). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DY (50). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's SMR Rating (45) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (65). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (46). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
| DY | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 11 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement