DY
Price
$425.55
Change
-$1.66 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.78B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$658.01
Change
-$10.16 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.27B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DY vs PWR

DY vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DY vs. PWR commentary
Jul 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DY is a Buy and PWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2026
Stock price -- (DY: $427.21 vs. PWR: $668.17)
Brand notoriety: DY and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DY: 56% vs. PWR: 55%
Market capitalization -- DY: $12.81B vs. PWR: $100.27B
DY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $12.81B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $100.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DY is a better buy in the long-term than PWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DY and PWR are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

DY is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.60% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($100B) has a higher market cap than DY($12.8B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than DY: PWR (91.66) vs DY (40.66). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 58.408 vs. DY (25.990). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. DY (807M). DY has more cash in the bank: 539M vs. PWR (250M). DY has less debt than PWR: DY (3B) vs PWR (6.32B). PWR has higher revenues than DY: PWR (30.1B) vs DY (6.25B).
DYPWRDY / PWR
Capitalization12.8B100B13%
EBITDA807M2.71B30%
Gain YTD25.99058.40844%
P/E Ratio40.6691.6644%
Revenue6.25B30.1B21%
Total Cash539M250M216%
Total Debt3B6.32B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DY vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
DY
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5959
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
124
SMR RATING
1..100
4663
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2819
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DY's Valuation (77) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (90). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (12). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.

DY's SMR Rating (46) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (63). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (44). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (28). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DYPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LXEH1.410.05
+3.68%
Lixiang Education Holding Co. Ltd.
NKLR4.940.07
+1.44%
Terra Innovatum Global N.V.
CSBR5.820.01
+0.17%
Champions Oncology
AVPT12.44-0.23
-1.82%
AvePoint
TKO184.40-3.78
-2.01%
TKO Group Holdings

DY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DY
1D Price
Change %
DY100%
-0.35%
MTZ - DY
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
MYRG - DY
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
PWR - DY
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
FIX - DY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
STRL - DY
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
More