Advertisement
DY vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dycom Industries (DY) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- DY and PWR operate in the engineering and construction sector, providing specialty contracting services primarily to telecommunications, utilities, and infrastructure markets.
- PWR has delivered substantially stronger year-to-date performance, returning approximately 71% compared to DY’s roughly 22%, reflecting broader exposure to electric utility and data center demand.
- Both companies reported robust recent quarterly results, with DY posting record Q4 revenue and PWR achieving record Q1 results alongside a raised full-year 2026 outlook and significant backlog growth.
- PWR maintains a larger market capitalization and more diversified revenue streams across electric power, renewables, and communications, while DY focuses more narrowly on telecommunications and utility infrastructure.
- Market sentiment remains positive for both amid ongoing infrastructure spending, though PWR’s positioning in AI-related power needs has contributed to its outperformance in recent market activity.
- Relative risk factors include project execution, regulatory environments, and macroeconomic conditions affecting capital expenditures in both companies’ end markets.
Introduction
Dycom Industries (DY) and Quanta Services (PWR) are publicly traded companies in the specialty contracting space, serving overlapping yet distinct segments of the telecommunications and utility infrastructure markets. This comparison examines their business profiles, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating exposure within the broader infrastructure sector. Market participants focused on growth tied to digital infrastructure buildout, grid modernization, and utility spending may find the analysis relevant for assessing trade-offs in scale, momentum, and sector drivers.
DY Overview and Recent Performance
Dycom Industries provides specialty contracting services to the telecommunications infrastructure and utility industries across the United States. The company focuses on engineering, construction, and maintenance for fiber optic networks, wireless facilities, and related utility projects. In recent market activity, DY shares have shown resilience following strong fourth-quarter results that featured record revenue and an earnings beat, supporting continued organic growth and backlog expansion. Performance in recent weeks has been influenced by sustained demand for digital infrastructure, though the stock has trailed broader sector leaders amid varying investor focus on larger-scale utility plays.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services delivers infrastructure solutions for electric and gas utilities, power generation, communications, pipelines, and energy industries in the United States, Canada, and Australia. The company’s operations span transmission, distribution, and renewable energy projects. Recent performance has been robust, with first-quarter results marking records in revenue, adjusted earnings, and backlog, prompting an upward revision to full-year 2026 guidance. In recent market activity, PWR has benefited from heightened attention to electric grid investments and data center power requirements, contributing to its notable gains relative to the broader market.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a larger pool of hundreds available on the platform. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the best and most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in this curated Trending AI Robots section. The page currently highlights the best 25 AI trending bots selected out of 351 total, spanning various timeframes, asset classes, and strategies including technical and fundamental analysis. All the AI trading bots have different trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Traders interested in automated strategies can explore the full range of options directly on the platform.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, both firms provide specialty contracting but differ in scope: DY maintains a more concentrated focus on telecommunications and select utility work, whereas PWR operates across a wider array of electric power, renewable, and large-scale infrastructure projects. Growth drivers for DY center on telecom network expansion and utility upgrades, while PWR benefits additionally from electrification trends and data center connectivity demands. Recent momentum favors PWR, evidenced by its stronger year-to-date and longer-term returns alongside record backlog levels. Risk factors for both include execution on large projects, labor availability, and sensitivity to capital spending cycles, though PWR’s greater scale and diversification may moderate certain exposures. Sector sentiment remains constructive for infrastructure overall, with PWR appearing to capture more immediate attention from AI-related power themes in recent market positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, backlog strength, and relative positioning in high-growth end markets, Tickeron’s AI may currently favor PWR. The company’s broader exposure to electric utility and data center infrastructure, combined with recent record results and raised guidance, suggests greater alignment with prevailing market catalysts compared to DY’s more specialized profile. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to ongoing developments rather than a definitive ranking.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DY is a Hold and PWR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.70% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
DY is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+1.33% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| DY | PWR | DY / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 13.7B | 105B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 807M | 2.71B | 30% |
| Gain YTD | 35.144 | 66.462 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.62 | 96.33 | 45% |
| Revenue | 6.25B | 30.1B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 539M | 365M | 148% |
| Total Debt | 3B | 6.32B | 47% |
DY | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DY's Valuation (79) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (88). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (8). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's SMR Rating (46) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (63). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
DY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (39). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (21). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
| DY | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
DY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 78% Closely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 68% Closely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| EME - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||