DY
Price
$419.43
Change
+$10.02 (+2.45%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.3B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$685.64
Change
+$12.86 (+1.91%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
101.15B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DY vs PWR

DY vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DY vs. PWR commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DY is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (DY: $409.41 vs. PWR: $672.78)
Brand notoriety: DY and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DY: 52% vs. PWR: 64%
Market capitalization -- DY: $12.3B vs. PWR: $101.15B
DY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $12.3B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $101.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $8.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DY and PWR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than DY.

Price Growth

DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

DY is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-2.58% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($101B) has a higher market cap than DY($12.3B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than DY: PWR (76.98) vs DY (39.10). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 59.501 vs. DY (21.163). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.08B vs. DY (807M). DY has more cash in the bank: 539M vs. PWR (506M). DY has less debt than PWR: DY (3B) vs PWR (6.6B). PWR has higher revenues than DY: PWR (32.9B) vs DY (6.25B).
DYPWRDY / PWR
Capitalization12.3B101B12%
EBITDA807M3.08B26%
Gain YTD21.16359.50136%
P/E Ratio39.1076.9851%
Revenue6.25B32.9B19%
Total Cash539M506M107%
Total Debt3B6.6B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DY vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
DY
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1125
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2115
SMR RATING
1..100
4656
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3424
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DY's Valuation (76) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (86). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (21). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.

DY's SMR Rating (46) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (52). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (34). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DYPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRUP31.000.68
+2.24%
Trupanion
BRNS0.580.01
+1.77%
Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc
UL62.680.96
+1.56%
Unilever plc
RIG5.720.02
+0.35%
Transocean Ltd
CEPO10.67N/A
N/A
Cantor Equity Partners I Inc

DY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DY
1D Price
Change %
DY100%
-0.19%
MTZ - DY
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
PWR - DY
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
FIX - DY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
MYRG - DY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
ECG - DY
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
More