Advertisement
DY vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dycom Industries (DY) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both DY and PWR are specialty infrastructure contractors benefiting from AI-driven demand for data centers, fiber, and electric-grid buildouts, but they operate at very different scales.
- PWR is the larger, more diversified business, with a record backlog of roughly $53.4 billion and full-year revenue guidance near $39 billion to $40 billion.
- DY has delivered record quarters on surging fiber and data-center work, with a record backlog above $12 billion and multiple upward revisions to its fiscal-year outlook.
- Relative performance has diverged recently: PWR has maintained strong year-to-date gains, while DY pulled back after an extended multi-year rally despite solid fundamentals.
- Both names carry premium valuations and share exposure to the same secular tailwinds, so the comparison centers on scale, diversification, and recent momentum rather than a clear quality gap.
- For deeper, ticker-specific coverage, explore DY Major News and DY Today's Price Move, as well as PWR Major News and PWR Today's Price Move.
- To see how AI-powered systems are trading these and other stocks, visit the curated Trending AI Robots page.
Introduction
Dycom Industries and Quanta Services are two of the most direct beneficiaries of a multi-year buildout in connectivity and power infrastructure. Both companies convert rising capital spending on fiber networks, data centers, and electric grids into contracted revenue, making them natural comparables for investors tracking the AI-infrastructure theme. This stock comparison is most relevant to growth-oriented investors and traders who want to weigh a smaller, fiber-centric contractor against a much larger, more diversified power-infrastructure leader. By examining their recent performance, backlog growth, and market positioning, readers can better understand how these two stocks differ in risk, momentum, and opportunity despite overlapping end-market demand.
DY Overview and Recent Performance
Dycom Industries is a leading provider of specialty contracting services to the telecommunications-infrastructure and utility industries, spanning program management, engineering, and aerial, underground, and wireless construction. The company also maintains a growing electrical-contracting business serving data centers and other critical facilities. In recent quarters, DY has reported record results, with contract revenues expanding sharply on robust fiber-to-the-home programs, long-haul and middle-mile fiber builds, and accelerating data-center work. Management has raised its fiscal-year outlook multiple times, supported by a record backlog above $12 billion and a recent acquisition of National Technology Integrators, which adds structured-cabling capabilities inside data centers.
Despite these strong operating trends, DY shares pulled back notably after an extended rally, with recent weeks marked by softer momentum even as earnings estimates moved higher. Investors appear to be balancing Dycom's accelerating growth and margin expansion against a premium valuation and some near-term margin pressure within its Communications segment from workforce investments and wireless-work timing.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services is the largest electrical-infrastructure construction company in the United States, providing engineering, construction, and maintenance services across electric transmission, substations, power generation, and large-load facilities such as data centers. In recent quarters, PWR has delivered accelerating revenue growth and sharply higher profitability, driven by grid modernization and surging demand for reliable power from hyperscale data-center operators. The company raised its full-year guidance on multiple occasions, and its backlog climbed to a record of roughly $53.4 billion, reflecting broad demand across utility, generation, and transmission markets.
Quanta has also been active in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), completing several acquisitions in recent months to extend its civil, mechanical, and engineering capabilities. PWR shares surged strongly through the first half of the year and reached record highs before a sharp pullback in recent weeks. Even after that retreat, the stock retains substantial year-to-date gains and trades at a premium valuation relative to its industry.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each built around a distinct trading style, strategy, timeframe, and performance profile. Because market conditions change constantly, only a select group of bots currently suited to the prevailing environment is featured in the Trending AI Robots section. This curated list helps traders filter through a large and diverse universe of automated strategies, highlighting the systems whose recent performance and configuration align with today's market. For investors following infrastructure names like DY and PWR, reviewing these robots can offer a data-driven perspective on entry and exit signals without replacing independent research. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two stocks is scale and diversification. Quanta operates across the full power-infrastructure value chain with a multi-segment model and a backlog several times larger than Dycom's, giving it broader revenue visibility and exposure to transmission, generation, and large-load markets. Dycom is more concentrated in telecommunications contracting, with data-center work now forming a fast-growing but smaller second engine through its Building Systems segment.
Growth profiles also differ in pace and composition. Both companies are growing quickly, but DY has shown sharper year-over-year revenue acceleration from a smaller base, aided by acquisitions and fiber-program timing, while PWR has posted large absolute increases across a much larger revenue base. On risk, Dycom's narrower customer and segment focus and higher relative debt load introduce different sensitivities than Quanta's broader footprint, which is nonetheless exposed to permitting, labor, and supply-chain constraints.
Market sentiment has favored Quanta's scale and margin trajectory in recent periods, while Dycom's pullback reflects profit-taking and valuation concerns after a strong multi-year run. Sector exposure overlaps meaningfully, since both benefit from the same AI-infrastructure and electrification themes, making relative positioning and valuation the key differentiators.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, backlog visibility, and the breadth of growth catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PWR for its larger, more diversified revenue base and stronger recent momentum, while still recognizing DY as a high-growth alternative with compelling fundamentals. The probability-weighted view tends to reward Quanta's record backlog, sustained estimate revisions, and multi-segment exposure, which offer greater stability across market cycles. Dycom's faster growth and data-center expansion could appeal to investors seeking a more concentrated, higher-beta exposure, but its recent pullback suggests less consistent near-term momentum. Ultimately, the AI assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive, and either stock may lead depending on shifts in sentiment and execution.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DY is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Buy.
DY's RSI Indicator descends into oversold zone
The RSI Indicator for DY moved into overbought territory on November 04, 2026. Be on the watch for a price drop or consolidation in the future -- when this happens, think about selling the stock or exploring put options.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +4.22% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where DY advanced for three days, in 258 of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
DY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on DY as a result. In 48 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for DY turned negative on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where DY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for DY entered a downward trend on November 04, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.103) is normal, around the industry mean (15.296). P/E Ratio (19.146) is within average values for comparable stocks, (167.649). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.250) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.194) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.252) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. DY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. DY’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PWR's RSI Oscillator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for PWR moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 16 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 14 of the 16 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PWR just turned positive on November 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where PWR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +5.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWR advanced for three days, in 259 of 349 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
PWR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PWR as a result. In 50 of 80 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
PWR moved below its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PWR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
The Aroon Indicator for PWR entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 30 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PWR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 86 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.054) is normal, around the industry mean (15.296). P/E Ratio (65.439) is within average values for comparable stocks, (167.649). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.443) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.194) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.860) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
DY | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DY's Valuation (44) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (86). This means that DY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DY (71). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DY’s over the last 12 months.
DY's SMR Rating (48) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that DY’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (82). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DY (84). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than DY’s over the last 12 months.
| DY | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 14 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- DY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -9.26% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -9.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -19.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -33.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
DY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-9.95% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
DY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.