Ad is loading...
DYGAX vs RGWBX
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts DYGAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Adviser
Price$12.86
Change-$0.58 (-4.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.65M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.24
Change-$1.14 (-4.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DYGAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYGAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. DYGAX (373M). DYGAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: DYGAX (1.62) vs RGWBX (0.00). DYGAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: DYGAX (8 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than DYGAX (1.09). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DYGAX: RGWBX (250) vs DYGAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.68 vs. DYGAX (-8.03). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.83 vs. DYGAX (54.44).
| DYGAX | RGWBX | DYGAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.319 | -3.944 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 19.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.03 | -0.68 | 1,181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.53 | 0.30 | 1,172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.44 | 60.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...