Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DYGAX vs RGWBX
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts DYGAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Adviser
Price$14.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets396.83M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.48
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.77B
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DYGAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYGAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.8B vs. DYGAX (397M). DYGAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: DYGAX (1.54) vs RGWBX (0.00). DYGAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: DYGAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than DYGAX (1.09). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DYGAX: RGWBX (250) vs DYGAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. DYGAX (-5.34). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. DYGAX (27.49).
| DYGAX | RGWBX | DYGAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.894 | 4.807 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 397M | 21.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | 7.23 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.14 | 26.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.49 | 35.74 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement