Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DYGAX vs RGWBX
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts DYGAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Adviser
Price$15.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets427.33M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.63B
DYGAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DYGAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYGAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. DYGAX (427M). DYGAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: DYGAX (1.43) vs RGWBX (0.00). DYGAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: DYGAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than DYGAX (1.09). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DYGAX: RGWBX (250) vs DYGAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. DYGAX (1.17). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. DYGAX (28.81).
| DYGAX | RGWBX | DYGAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.033 | 12.983 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 14.58 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.00 | 31.07 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.81 | 37.00 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers