Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAALX vs RGACX
EAALX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EAALX vs RGACX
EAALX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAALX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAALX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. EAALX (463M). EAALX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAALX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EAALX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EAALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EAALX (11.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAALX: RGACX (250) vs EAALX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. EAALX (-15.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. EAALX (-0.21).
| EAALX | RGACX | EAALX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.136 | 8.819 | -70% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.81 | -0.53 | 2,976% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.34 | 40.68 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.21 | 10.82 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.63 | 101.31 | 51% |