Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAALX vs RGAGX
EAALX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts EAALX vs RGAGX
EAALX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAALX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAALX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. EAALX (506M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than EAALX: RGAGX (0.51) vs EAALX (0.00). EAALX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: EAALX (23 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). EAALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EAALX (11.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAALX: RGAGX (250) vs EAALX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. EAALX (-17.05). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. EAALX (3.11).
| EAALX | RGAGX | EAALX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.29 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.126 | 8.887 | -136% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.05 | 12.55 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.76 | 50.34 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.11 | 20.99 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.20 | 122.10 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement