Ad is loading...
EAASX vs PAMCX
EAASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$33.44
Change+$0.38 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.88B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$88.72
Change+$0.79 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.52B
EAASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. PAMCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Buy and PAMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. EAASX (13.9B). EAASX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: EAASX (21 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). EAASX (1.12) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EAASX (9.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: EAASX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). EAASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.96 vs. PAMCX (-10.91). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : 19.31 vs. PAMCX (5.72).
| EAASX | PAMCX | EAASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.01 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.01 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.699 | -6.418 | 73% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 26.5B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.96 | -10.91 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.51 | 3.65 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.31 | 5.72 | 337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.85 | 11.21 | 302% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers