Ad is loading...
Compare predictions EAASX vs PAMCX
EAASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$30.76
Change-$0.20 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$92.84
Change-$0.36 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
EAASX vs. PAMCX commentary
Nov 29, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Hold and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.5B vs. EAASX (10.7B). EAASX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: EAASX (20 years) vs PAMCX (24 years). EAASX (1.14) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.02). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.40 vs. EAASX (7.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: EAASX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. EAASX (-6.67). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.33 vs. EAASX (9.02).
| EAASX | PAMCX | EAASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.02 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.02 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.620 | 9.818 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 10.7B | 28.5B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.67 | 5.03 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.16 | -10.60 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.02 | 27.33 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.42 | 102.26 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers