Ad is loading...
EAASX vs RRMGX
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$33.66
Change-$0.47 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.38B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.45
Change-$1.84 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.49B
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. EAASX (15.4B). EAASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: EAASX (21 years) vs RRMGX (22 years). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. EAASX (14.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: EAASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). EAASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. RRMGX (-6.96). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : -0.65 vs. RRMGX (-4.19).
| EAASX | RRMGX | EAASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.969 | -0.535 | 555% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4B | 29.5B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | -6.96 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.11 | -4.36 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.65 | -4.19 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.11 | 14.90 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...