Ad is loading...
EAASX vs RRMGX
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$34.80
Change-$1.12 (-3.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$88.01
Change-$3.05 (-3.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. EAASX (16.1B). EAASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: EAASX (21 years) vs RRMGX (22 years). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. EAASX (14.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: EAASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). EAASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.81 vs. RRMGX (2.81). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. RRMGX (3.17).
| EAASX | RRMGX | EAASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.956 | 1.494 | 867% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 31.4B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.81 | 2.81 | 491% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.93 | -12.00 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 3.17 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.70 | 25.86 | 208% |