Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRAX
EABLX vs FFRAX Comparison
Open Charts EABLX vs FFRAX
EABLX vs FFRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRAX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. EABLX (3.04B). FFRAX (6.80) and EABLX (6.78) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRAX: EABLX (25 years) vs FFRAX (26 years). EABLX (1.07) and FFRAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FFRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. EABLX (35.00). FFRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRAX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. EABLX (2.30). FFRAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.34 vs. EABLX (23.79).
| EABLX | FFRAX | EABLX / FFRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.02 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.02 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.381 | 1.495 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 3.04B | 14.3B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.78 | 6.80 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 5.61 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.33 | 24.00 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.79 | 31.34 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.48 | 62.03 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers