Ad is loading...
EABLX vs FFRHX
EABLX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRHX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. EABLX (4.53B). FFRHX (8.13) and EABLX (7.89) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: EABLX (24 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). EABLX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (19.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRHX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. EABLX (5.00). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. EABLX (36.42).
| EABLX | FFRHX | EABLX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.73 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.73 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.850 | -0.828 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 16B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.89 | 8.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 5.47 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 21.03 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 44.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.18 | 55.04 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers