Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRHX
EABLX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRHX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. EABLX (4.13B). FFRHX (7.97) and EABLX (7.72) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: EABLX (24 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). EABLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (31.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRHX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. EABLX (6.01). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.88 vs. EABLX (32.82).
| EABLX | FFRHX | EABLX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.73 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.73 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.136 | 1.525 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 14.8B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.72 | 7.97 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.01 | 6.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.89 | 29.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.82 | 40.88 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.45 | 59.04 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement