Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRHX
EABLX vs FFRHX Comparison
Open Charts EABLX vs FFRHX
EABLX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRHX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. EABLX (2.96B). FFRHX pays higher dividends than EABLX: FFRHX (6.97) vs EABLX (6.56). EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: EABLX (26 years) vs FFRHX (24 years). EABLX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. EABLX (35.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRHX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. EABLX (1.42). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.03 vs. EABLX (23.44).
| EABLX | FFRHX | EABLX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.73 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.73 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.475 | 3.185 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 14.6B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.56 | 6.97 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | 5.89 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.41 | 23.49 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.44 | 35.03 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.41 | 65.86 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement