Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRTX
EABLX vs FFRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRTX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. EABLX (4.08B). EABLX (7.53) and FFRTX (7.49) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRTX: EABLX (25 years) vs FFRTX (25 years). EABLX (1.06) and FFRTX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FFRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (31.00). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRTX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.57 vs. EABLX (5.95). FFRTX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. EABLX (31.29).
| EABLX | FFRTX | EABLX / FFRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.02 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.02 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.229 | 2.370 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.08B | 15.2B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.53 | 7.49 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 6.57 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.59 | 24.80 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.29 | 36.70 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.15 | 57.18 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement