Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRTX
EABLX vs FFRTX Comparison
Open Charts EABLX vs FFRTX
EABLX vs FFRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRTX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 14.3B vs. EABLX (3.04B). FFRTX (6.79) and EABLX (6.78) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRTX: EABLX (25 years) vs FFRTX (26 years). EABLX (1.07) and FFRTX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . FFRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. EABLX (35.00). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRTX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. EABLX (2.30). FFRTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.35 vs. EABLX (23.79).
| EABLX | FFRTX | EABLX / FFRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.02 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.02 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.381 | 1.492 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 3.04B | 14.3B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.78 | 6.79 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 5.49 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.33 | 23.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.79 | 31.35 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.48 | 61.71 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers