Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs TRIZX
EABLX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.32B vs. EABLX (4.08B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than EABLX: TRIZX (8.13) vs EABLX (7.53). EABLX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: EABLX (25 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). EABLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. EABLX (31.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: TRIZX (0) vs EABLX (1000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. EABLX (5.82). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.67 vs. EABLX (31.29).
| EABLX | TRIZX | EABLX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.02 | 5,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.229 | 4.085 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.08B | 4.32B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.53 | 8.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 8.38 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.59 | 29.65 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.29 | 41.67 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement