Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs TRIZX
EABLX vs TRIZX Comparison
Open Charts EABLX vs TRIZX
EABLX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. TRIZX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and TRIZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.01B vs. EABLX (2.96B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than EABLX: TRIZX (7.56) vs EABLX (6.56). EABLX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: EABLX (26 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). EABLX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.40 vs. EABLX (35.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: TRIZX (0) vs EABLX (1000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.92 vs. EABLX (1.42). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.62 vs. EABLX (23.44).
| EABLX | TRIZX | EABLX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.02 | 5,300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.61 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.475 | 2.658 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 4.01B | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.56 | 7.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | 5.92 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.41 | 26.88 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.44 | 39.62 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement