Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs NCMAX
EACAX vs NCMAX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs NCMAX
EACAX vs NCMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. NCMAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and NCMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. NCMAX (259M). EACAX pays higher dividends than NCMAX: EACAX (3.51) vs NCMAX (2.95). EACAX was incepted earlier than NCMAX: EACAX (32 years) vs NCMAX (24 years). EACAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than NCMAX (0.58). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. NCMAX (16.00). EACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCMAX: EACAX (1000) vs NCMAX (2000). EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. NCMAX (5.48). NCMAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.86 vs. EACAX (3.44).
| EACAX | NCMAX | EACAX / NCMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.48 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.58 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.959 | 1.044 | 188% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 259M | 413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 2.95 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 5.48 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.70 | 9.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.44 | 4.86 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.60 | 16.38 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement