Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCMBX
EACAX vs PCMBX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMBX
EACAX vs PCMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMBX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. PCMBX (374M). EACAX pays higher dividends than PCMBX: EACAX (3.54) vs PCMBX (3.00). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMBX: EACAX (32 years) vs PCMBX (27 years). PCMBX (0.78) and EACAX (0.77) have similar cost to investors . EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PCMBX (43.00). EACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than PCMBX (2%) vs PCMBX (2%). EACAX (1000) and PCMBX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.07 vs. PCMBX (-0.63). PCMBX return over 5 years is better than : -0.25 vs. EACAX (-0.27).
| EACAX | PCMBX | EACAX / PCMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.78 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.78 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.499 | -1.941 | 77% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 144% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 374M | 292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 3.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.07 | -0.63 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.58 | 8.59 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.27 | -0.25 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.72 | 11.69 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement