Ad is loading...
EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMFX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
Principal California Municipal Instl
Price$9.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets612.67M
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. PCMFX (613M). PCMFX (3.42) and EACAX (3.36) have matching dividends . EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCMFX (10 years). EACAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.65). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCMFX (35.90). PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACAX: PCMFX (0) vs EACAX (1000). PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.26 vs. EACAX (1.03). PCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.34 vs. EACAX (2.57).
| EACAX | PCMFX | EACAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.352 | -1.688 | 139% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 613M | 164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | 1.26 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.12 | 4.39 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.57 | 4.34 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.42 | 21.05 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...