Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMFX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets993.21M
Principal California Municipal Instl
Price$9.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.16M
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMFX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 993M vs. PCMFX (643M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than EACAX: PCMFX (3.62) vs EACAX (3.16). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCMFX (11 years). EACAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.65). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCMFX (35.90). PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACAX: PCMFX (0) vs EACAX (1000). PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.46 vs. EACAX (1.83). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.94 vs. PCMFX (2.45).
| EACAX | PCMFX | EACAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.984 | 2.721 | 73% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 643M | 154% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.62 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.83 | 2.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 15.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.94 | 2.45 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.52 | 24.53 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement