Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMFX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets979.64M
Principal California Municipal Instl
Price$9.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.83M
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 980M vs. PCMFX (610M). PCMFX (3.56) and EACAX (3.48) have matching dividends . EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCMFX (10 years). EACAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.65). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCMFX (35.90). PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACAX: PCMFX (0) vs EACAX (1000). PCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.15 vs. EACAX (0.38). PCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.39 vs. EACAX (-0.35).
| EACAX | PCMFX | EACAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.754 | -0.446 | 393% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 610M | 161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 3.56 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | 1.15 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.96 | 6.79 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.35 | 0.39 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.92 | 22.98 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement