Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMFX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. PCMFX (675M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than EACAX: PCMFX (3.81) vs EACAX (3.51). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: EACAX (32 years) vs PCMFX (12 years). EACAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.64). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PCMFX (52.20). PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACAX: PCMFX (0) vs EACAX (1000). EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. PCMFX (4.93). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.90 vs. PCMFX (-1.44).
| EACAX | PCMFX | EACAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.60 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.64 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.634 | 0.648 | 98% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 675M | 160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.81 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 4.93 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.12 | 11.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.90 | -1.44 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.14 | 16.80 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers