Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCMFX
EACAX vs PCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCMFX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. PCMFX (655M). PCMFX pays higher dividends than EACAX: PCMFX (3.80) vs EACAX (3.54). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCMFX: EACAX (32 years) vs PCMFX (12 years). EACAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than PCMFX (0.64). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PCMFX (52.20). PCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACAX: PCMFX (0) vs EACAX (1000). EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.07 vs. PCMFX (-0.31). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.27 vs. PCMFX (-3.62).
| EACAX | PCMFX | EACAX / PCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.60 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.64 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.499 | -1.651 | 91% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 655M | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 3.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.07 | -0.31 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.58 | 8.90 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.27 | -3.62 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.72 | 15.03 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers