Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAEAX vs RGSFX
EAEAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts EAEAX vs RGSFX
EAEAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAEAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAEAX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. EAEAX (944M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than EAEAX: RGSFX (0.49) vs EAEAX (0.37). EAEAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: EAEAX (25 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). EAEAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). EAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAEAX: RGSFX (250) vs EAEAX (1000). EAEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. RGSFX (6.56). EAEAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.23 vs. RGSFX (20.57).
| EAEAX | RGSFX | EAEAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.51 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.51 | 339% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.846 | 9.768 | 111% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 28.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.49 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 6.56 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.81 | 57.26 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.23 | 20.57 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.89 | 112.18 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement