Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAEAX vs RGSFX
EAEAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts EAEAX vs RGSFX
EAEAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAEAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAEAX is a Hold and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. EAEAX (923M). RGSFX pays higher dividends than EAEAX: RGSFX (0.49) vs EAEAX (0.38). EAEAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: EAEAX (24 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). EAEAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). EAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAEAX: RGSFX (250) vs EAEAX (1000). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.96 vs. EAEAX (17.48). EAEAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.15 vs. RGSFX (28.09).
| EAEAX | RGSFX | EAEAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.51 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.51 | 339% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.423 | 11.188 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 923M | 28.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.48 | 20.96 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.32 | 61.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.15 | 28.09 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.78 | 130.14 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers