Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAEAX vs RGWBX
EAEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts EAEAX vs RGWBX
EAEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAEAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. EAEAX (923M). EAEAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: EAEAX (0.38) vs RGWBX (0.00). EAEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: EAEAX (24 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). EAEAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). EAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAEAX: RGWBX (250) vs EAEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. EAEAX (17.51). EAEAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.33 vs. RGWBX (25.03).
| EAEAX | RGWBX | EAEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.46 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.46 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.242 | 10.958 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 923M | 26.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.51 | 20.97 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.05 | 58.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.33 | 25.03 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.51 | 108.49 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement