Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFVX vs RMEBX
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMEBX
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. EAFVX (71.1M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMEBX (1.04) vs EAFVX (0.87). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EAFVX (15 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and EAFVX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). EAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.76 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. EAFVX (20.21).
| EAFVX | RMEBX | EAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.747 | 5.801 | 220% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.1M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.76 | 9.98 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.15 | 34.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 32.93 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.15 | 89.84 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement