Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAFVX vs RMEBX
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts EAFVX vs RMEBX
EAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. EAFVX (71.1M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than EAFVX: RMEBX (1.04) vs EAFVX (0.87). EAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: EAFVX (15 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and EAFVX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . EAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAFVX: RMEBX (250) vs EAFVX (1000). EAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.99 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. EAFVX (25.24).
| EAFVX | RMEBX | EAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.417 | 6.308 | 260% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.1M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.99 | 9.11 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.18 | 34.37 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.24 | 34.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.83 | 94.33 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement