Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EALCX vs RGABX
EALCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts EALCX vs RGABX
EALCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EALCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EALCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. EALCX (462M). EALCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . EALCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: EALCX (24 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than EALCX (1.04). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. EALCX (20.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than EALCX: RGABX (250) vs EALCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. EALCX (4.06). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. EALCX (8.49).
| EALCX | RGABX | EALCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.38 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.38 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.918 | 8.319 | 59% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 9.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.98 | 41.24 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.49 | 10.82 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.32 | 97.06 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement