Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAMAX vs RNWHX
EAMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EAMAX vs RNWHX
EAMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EAMAX (20.2M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EAMAX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EAMAX (0.75). EAMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EAMAX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EAMAX (5.58) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAMAX: RNWHX (250) vs EAMAX (1500). EAMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.44 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| EAMAX | RNWHX | EAMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.72 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.58 | 0.72 | 775% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.098 | 18.743 | 193% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.15 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.44 | 31.15 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.61 | 57.37 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement