RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. EAMAX (19.2M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EAMAX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EAMAX (0.77). EAMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EAMAX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EAMAX (5.58) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EAMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EAMAX: RNWHX (250) vs EAMAX (1500). EAMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.37 vs. RNWHX (17.19).

	EAMAX	RNWHX	EAMAX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	1.15	0.72	160%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	5.58	0.72	775%
Fund Existence	5 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	27.512	16.447	167%
Front Load	6%	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	1500	250	600%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	19.2M	90B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.77	1.15	67%
Returns for 1 year	35.37	17.19	206%
Returns for 3 years	100.69	53.84	187%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	17.68	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	111.44	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FLPEX	46.31	0.28	+0.61%
Fidelity Advisor Low-Priced Stock C
FACDX	64.25	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor Health Care A
EXHAX	26.61	N/A	N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
LMCFX	35.98	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
MSAWX	22.51	N/A	N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp C