Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAPCX vs PCRAX
EAPCX vs PCRAX Comparison
Open Charts EAPCX vs PCRAX
EAPCX vs PCRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAPCX vs. PCRAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAPCX is a Hold and PCRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCRAX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. EAPCX (2.98B). EAPCX pays higher dividends than PCRAX: EAPCX (10.95) vs PCRAX (5.77). EAPCX was incepted earlier than PCRAX: EAPCX (14 years) vs PCRAX (24 years). PCRAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than EAPCX (0.94). PCRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 268.00 vs. EAPCX (17.00). PCRAX initial investment is less costly to investors than EAPCX (3%) vs EAPCX (3%). EAPCX (1000) and PCRAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.33 vs. PCRAX (37.66). EAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 96.71 vs. PCRAX (63.94).
| EAPCX | PCRAX | EAPCX / PCRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.30 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.38 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.679 | 26.103 | 83% |
| Front Load | 3% | 6% | 59% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.98B | 4.78B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.95 | 5.77 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.33 | 37.66 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.00 | 55.71 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.71 | 63.94 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.26 | 101.47 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement