EAT
Price
$164.89
Change
+$6.09 (+3.84%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.07B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBUX
Price
$100.65
Change
+$0.83 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
114.71B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAT vs SBUX

EAT vs SBUX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. SBUX commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Hold and SBUX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2026
Stock price -- (EAT: $158.80 vs. SBUX: $99.82)
Brand notoriety: EAT: Not notable vs. SBUX: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 57% vs. SBUX: 91%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $7.07B vs. SBUX: $114.71B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $7.07B. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $114.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $197.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the long-term than EAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than SBUX.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +7.73% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.51% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($115B) has a higher market cap than EAT($7.07B). SBUX has higher P/E ratio than EAT: SBUX (76.83) vs EAT (16.07). SBUX YTD gains are higher at: 20.001 vs. EAT (10.647). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.77B vs. EAT (818M). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. EAT (57.1M). EAT has less debt than SBUX: EAT (1.75B) vs SBUX (24.4B). SBUX has higher revenues than EAT: SBUX (38.5B) vs EAT (5.73B).
EATSBUXEAT / SBUX
Capitalization7.07B115B6%
EBITDA818M4.77B17%
Gain YTD10.64720.00153%
P/E Ratio16.0776.8321%
Revenue5.73B38.5B15%
Total Cash57.1M1.7B3%
Total Debt1.75B24.4B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4195
SMR RATING
1..100
108
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBUX's Valuation (22) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (76). This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBUX (95). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as EAT (10). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (52). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAT (85). This means that SBUX’s stock grew significantly faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBUX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNE25.311.30
+5.41%
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc
TG7.770.04
+0.52%
Tredegar Corp
COP111.21-0.13
-0.12%
ConocoPhillips
BYD83.88-2.59
-3.00%
Boyd Gaming Corp
AIXC1.43-0.06
-4.03%
AIxCrypto Holdings Inc.

EAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAT
1D Price
Change %
EAT100%
+3.42%
CAKE - EAT
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.07%
DRI - EAT
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
FRSH - EAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.47%
BJRI - EAT
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
DIN - EAT
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
More

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
-1.83%
FRSH - SBUX
53%
Loosely correlated
-5.47%
YUM - SBUX
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
CAKE - SBUX
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.07%
BLMN - SBUX
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
DRI - SBUX
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More