EBMT
Price
$23.46
Change
+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
186.55M
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCF
Price
$20.42
Change
+$0.13 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBMT vs FCF

EBMT vs FCF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBMT vs. FCF commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBMT is a Hold and FCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EBMT: $23.46 vs. FCF: $20.42)
Brand notoriety: EBMT and FCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBMT: 25% vs. FCF: 86%
Market capitalization -- EBMT: $186.55M vs. FCF: $2.08B
EBMT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $186.55M. FCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than EBMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBMT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBMT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EBMT is a better buy in the short-term than FCF.

Price Growth

EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while FCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

FCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($2.08B) has a higher market cap than EBMT($187M). FCF has higher P/E ratio than EBMT: FCF (13.43) vs EBMT (11.71). FCF YTD gains are higher at: 22.912 vs. EBMT (19.434). FCF has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. EBMT (24.1M). EBMT has less debt than FCF: EBMT (71.1M) vs FCF (155M). FCF has higher revenues than EBMT: FCF (538M) vs EBMT (92.8M).
EBMTFCFEBMT / FCF
Capitalization187M2.08B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.43422.91285%
P/E Ratio11.7113.4387%
Revenue92.8M538M17%
Total Cash24.1M103M23%
Total Debt71.1M155M46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBMT vs FCF: Fundamental Ratings
EBMT
FCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8131
SMR RATING
1..100
7042
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5646
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (42). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (81). This means that FCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (70). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (46). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (56). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBMTFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QCSCX25.87N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
DBMYX24.43N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Y
MSPRX23.48N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage C
HSWTX23.41N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders International Stk R5
GCEJX13.05N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Inv