EBYH
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.78M
MRT
Price
$2.98
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
39.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBYH vs MRT

Header iconEBYH vs MRT Comparison
Open Charts EBYH vs MRTBanner chart's image
E-Buy Home
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.78M
Marti Technologies
Price$2.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.07K
Capitalization39.83M
EBYH vs MRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EBYH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBYH vs. MRT commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBYH is a Hold and MRT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EBYH: $0.18 vs. MRT: $2.98)
Brand notoriety: EBYH and MRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBYH: 45% vs. MRT: 5%
Market capitalization -- EBYH: $1.78M vs. MRT: $39.83M
EBYH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.78M. MRT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $39.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBYH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBYH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the long-term than EBYH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBYH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBYH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the short-term than EBYH.

Price Growth

EBYH (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRT($39.8M) has a higher market cap than EBYH($1.78M). EBYH YTD gains are higher at: -6.130 vs. MRT (-11.947).
EBYHMRTEBYH / MRT
Capitalization1.78M39.8M4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.130-11.94751%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A3.97M-
Total DebtN/A28.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBYH vs MRT: Fundamental Ratings
EBYH
MRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
504
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBYH (47) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

EBYH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EBYH’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

EBYH's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that EBYH’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EBYH (53) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as EBYH (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBYHMRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBYH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGB3.130.08
+2.62%
Gerdau SA
MVST3.600.05
+1.41%
Microvast Holdings
OLPX1.58-0.02
-1.25%
Olaplex Holdings
SNY48.30-1.01
-2.05%
Sanofi ADS
NSYS8.79-0.70
-7.38%
Nortech Systems

EBYH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EBYH and FBSFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBYH and FBSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBYH
1D Price
Change %
EBYH100%
N/A
FBSFF - EBYH
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRT - EBYH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVWD - EBYH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DGNOF - EBYH
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.78%
DNACF - EBYH
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and CSGS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and CSGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
N/A
CSGS - MRT
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
APPS - MRT
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
HCAT - MRT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDFS - MRT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
SAP - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More