EC
Price
$7.64
Change
-$0.25 (-3.17%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
75 days until earnings call
GLPEF
Price
$17.15
Change
-$0.61 (-3.43%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

EC vs GLPEF

Header iconEC vs GLPEF Comparison
Open Charts EC vs GLPEFBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$7.64
Change-$0.25 (-3.17%)
Volume$2.05M
CapitalizationN/A
Galp Energia, SA
Price$17.15
Change-$0.61 (-3.43%)
Volume$259
CapitalizationN/A
EC vs GLPEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. GLPEF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Buy and GLPEF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EC: $7.64 vs. GLPEF: $17.15)
Brand notoriety: EC and GLPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 78% vs. GLPEF: 14%
Market capitalization -- EC: $21.83B vs. GLPEF: $10.87B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $21.83B. GLPEF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $10.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLPEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the long-term than EC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLPEF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLPEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the short-term than EC.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -8.61% price change this week, while GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-3.54% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($21.8B) has a higher market cap than GLPEF($10.9B). GLPEF (5.12) and EC (4.87) have similar P/E ratio . GLPEF YTD gains are higher at: 16.013 vs. EC (-22.006). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.36T vs. GLPEF (5.1B). EC has higher revenues than GLPEF: EC (148.1T) vs GLPEF (26.3B).
ECGLPEFEC / GLPEF
Capitalization21.8B10.9B200%
EBITDA49.36T5.1B967,673%
Gain YTD-22.00616.013-137%
P/E Ratio4.875.1295%
Revenue148.1T26.3B563,114%
Total CashN/A2.23B-
Total DebtN/A4.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs GLPEF: Fundamental Ratings
EC
GLPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6989
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10090
SMR RATING
1..100
1231
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5129
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (2) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLPEF (41) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as EC (100) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (31) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as EC (78) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as EC (51) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECGLPEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFSPX12.76-0.05
-0.39%
DFA Intl Sustainability Core 1
SNOCX30.29-0.14
-0.46%
Easterly Snow Long/Short Opportunity C
IRGUX49.50-0.36
-0.72%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Idx Port S
HERRX10.30-0.08
-0.77%
Hartford Emerging Markets Equity R3
RLLGX73.28-0.61
-0.83%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R6

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and E have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and E's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
N/A
E - GLPEF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
NFG - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
EC - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
EQNR - GLPEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
EIPAF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.39%
More