EC
Price
$10.43
Change
-$0.51 (-4.66%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.83B
9 days until earnings call
GLPEF
Price
$15.25
Change
-$0.20 (-1.29%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
10.87B
Ad is loading...

EC vs GLPEF

Header iconEC vs GLPEF Comparison
Open Charts EC vs GLPEFBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$10.43
Change-$0.51 (-4.66%)
Volume$2.78M
Capitalization21.83B
Galp Energia, SA
Price$15.25
Change-$0.20 (-1.29%)
Volume$789
Capitalization10.87B
EC vs GLPEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. GLPEF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Hold and GLPEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EC: $10.43 vs. GLPEF: $15.25)
Brand notoriety: EC and GLPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 108% vs. GLPEF: 59%
Market capitalization -- EC: $21.83B vs. GLPEF: $10.87B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $21.83B. GLPEF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $10.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLPEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than GLPEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -7.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-1.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($21.8B) has a higher market cap than GLPEF($10.9B). GLPEF (5.12) and EC (4.87) have similar P/E ratio . EC YTD gains are higher at: 31.692 vs. GLPEF (-12.356). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.36T vs. GLPEF (5.1B). EC has higher revenues than GLPEF: EC (148.1T) vs GLPEF (26.3B).
ECGLPEFEC / GLPEF
Capitalization21.8B10.9B200%
EBITDA49.36T5.1B967,673%
Gain YTD31.692-12.356-256%
P/E Ratio4.875.1295%
Revenue148.1T26.3B563,114%
Total CashN/A2.23B-
Total DebtN/A4.69B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs GLPEF: Fundamental Ratings
EC
GLPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
1331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (9) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (38) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (100) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (13) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (31) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLPEF (80) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (26) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIHSX14.29-0.02
-0.14%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I
ISBAX14.81-0.28
-1.86%
VY® Columbia Contrarian Core A
RNGGX63.84-1.36
-2.09%
American Funds New Economy R6
BRSPX13.75-0.33
-2.34%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R1
PSCZX24.18-0.67
-2.70%
PGIM Jennison Small Company Z

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and E have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and E's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
N/A
E - GLPEF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
NFG - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
EC - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
EQNR - GLPEF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
EIPAF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More