Ad is loading...
ECASX vs PAMCX
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$27.20
Change+$0.31 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.88B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$88.72
Change+$0.79 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.52B
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. PAMCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and PAMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. ECASX (13.9B). ECASX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: ECASX (16 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: ECASX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.30 vs. PAMCX (-10.91). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : 6.80 vs. PAMCX (5.72).
| ECASX | PAMCX | ECASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.585 | -6.418 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 26.5B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.30 | -10.91 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.73 | 3.65 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | 5.72 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.75 | 11.21 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers