Ad is loading...
ECASX vs RPMGX
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$29.14
Change+$0.29 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.97B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$104.46
Change+$1.15 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.9B
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. ECASX (15B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than ECASX: RPMGX (0.05) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ECASX (15 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. ECASX (14.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. RPMGX (4.45). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 10.07 vs. ECASX (-3.54).
| ECASX | RPMGX | ECASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.979 | 4.743 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 30.9B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 4.45 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.55 | -0.17 | -918% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.54 | 10.07 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.43 | 40.15 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...