Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RPTIX
ECASX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPTIX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$27.24
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.69
Change+$0.19 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27B
ECASX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RPTIX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RPTIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX pays higher dividends than ECASX: RPTIX (0.05) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: ECASX (16 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). RPTIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: ECASX (1000) vs RPTIX (500000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.46 vs. ECASX (-9.09). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.00 vs. ECASX (-4.28).
| ECASX | RPTIX | ECASX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.535 | 2.459 | -144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 27B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.09 | -5.46 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.86 | 13.46 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.28 | 2.00 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.17 | 29.94 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement