Ad is loading...
ECASX vs RRMGX
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$25.64
Change+$0.14 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$77.17
Change+$0.51 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.35B
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.4B vs. ECASX (14.2B). ECASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.78 vs. RRMGX (-15.03). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : 6.92 vs. RRMGX (1.06).
| ECASX | RRMGX | ECASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.31 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.31 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.862 | -12.227 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 25.4B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.78 | -15.03 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.65 | -15.06 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.92 | 1.06 | 652% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.19 | -0.59 | -1,213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers