Ad is loading...
ECASX vs RRMGX
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$27.20
Change+$0.31 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.88B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$82.93
Change+$0.74 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.52B
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RRMGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. ECASX (13.9B). ECASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.41 vs. RRMGX (-11.74). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : 7.52 vs. RRMGX (2.56).
| ECASX | RRMGX | ECASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.949 | -6.517 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 26.5B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.41 | -11.74 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.63 | 1.77 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.52 | 2.56 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.75 | 6.23 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers