Ad is loading...
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$27.20
Change+$0.31 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.88B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$95.45
Change+$0.85 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.76B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 26.8B vs. ECASX (13.9B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.67) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.41 vs. TRQZX (-9.44). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.44 vs. ECASX (7.52).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.61 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.949 | -6.076 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 26.8B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.41 | -9.44 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.63 | 7.89 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.52 | 11.44 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers