Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$26.95
Change-$0.43 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$99.02
Change-$1.43 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.6B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.6B vs. ECASX (14.2B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.64) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.69 vs. TRQZX (-3.40). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 12.31 vs. ECASX (2.78).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.61 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.217 | -0.268 | 1,200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 27.6B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.69 | -3.40 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | 17.62 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.78 | 12.31 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers