Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$27.29
Change-$0.20 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.99B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.66
Change-$0.43 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.11B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. ECASX (14B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.60) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.70 vs. ECASX (-7.81). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 4.43 vs. ECASX (-4.15).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.61 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.828 | 3.346 | -85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 27.1B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.81 | -3.70 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.62 | 16.22 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.15 | 4.43 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers