Ad is loading...
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$25.64
Change+$0.14 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$88.75
Change+$0.59 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.35B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.4B vs. ECASX (14.2B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.66) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.62). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). ECASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.78 vs. TRQZX (-12.83). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.80 vs. ECASX (6.92).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.62 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.862 | -11.884 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 25.4B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.78 | -12.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.65 | -9.96 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.92 | 9.80 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...