Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEOX vs RNWBX
ECEOX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEOX vs RNWBX
Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Open
Price$11.99
Change+$0.11 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.85M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.96
Change+$0.43 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
ECEOX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEOX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEOX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. ECEOX (133M). ECEOX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ECEOX (0.90) vs RNWBX (0.13). ECEOX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: ECEOX (12 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) and ECEOX (1.65) have similar cost to investors . ECEOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEOX: RNWBX (250) vs ECEOX (2500). ECEOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.23 vs. RNWBX (9.59). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. ECEOX (17.10).
| ECEOX | RNWBX | ECEOX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.67 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.734 | 15.513 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.13 | 705% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.23 | 9.59 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 35.33 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.10 | 24.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.87 | 62.62 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement