Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$18.89
Change-$0.18 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.47M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. ECFVX (232M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.16) vs ECFVX (0.47). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. ECFVX (-2.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. ECFVX (33.59).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.07 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.996 | 5.923 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.45 | 8.54 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.61 | 27.89 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | 58.69 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.98 | 68.22 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement