Ad is loading...
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$16.75
Change-$0.32 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$51.02
Change-$0.39 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.86B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 93.9B vs. ECFVX (234M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.18) vs ECFVX (0.47). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.34 vs. ECFVX (-11.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.86 vs. ECFVX (31.57).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.07 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.535 | -6.815 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 93.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.18 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.12 | -3.34 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.39 | -0.08 | 13,755% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.57 | 47.86 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.96 | 46.45 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...