Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.77M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.68
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.29B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. ECFVX (238M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.12) vs ECFVX (0.46). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. ECFVX (1.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.23 vs. ECFVX (40.48).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.07 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.149 | 9.293 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.12 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.28 | 10.88 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.56 | 28.79 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.48 | 60.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 76.42 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement