Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.73M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. ECFVX (238M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.09) vs ECFVX (0.45). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. ECFVX (-1.10). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. ECFVX (34.01).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.878 | 12.681 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.10 | 6.63 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.69 | 33.39 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.01 | 57.72 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.04 | 94.26 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement