Ad is loading...
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.81
Change+$0.16 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.39M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.36
Change+$0.39 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. ECFVX (233M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.54) vs ECFVX (0.16). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. ECFVX (12.21). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. ECFVX (19.65).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.987 | 4.481 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.54 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.21 | 13.64 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.51 | 15.51 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.65 | 44.04 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.85 | 68.60 | 64% |