Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$18.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.61M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. ECFVX (220M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.21) vs ECFVX (0.49). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. ECFVX (-6.19). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.06 vs. ECFVX (39.03).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.07 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.149 | 2.865 | -75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.21 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.19 | 5.09 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.67 | 17.98 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.03 | 58.06 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.02 | 60.34 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement