Ad is loading...
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$19.41
Change-$0.16 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.06M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.43
Change-$0.34 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.79B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. ECFVX (252M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.54) vs ECFVX (0.16). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.15 vs. ECFVX (6.60). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.26 vs. ECFVX (32.74).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.568 | 5.228 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.54 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 11.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.85 | 19.25 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.74 | 57.26 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.06 | 65.20 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...