Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ECFVX (72.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (0.99) vs ECFVX (0.27). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ECFVX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). ECFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.43 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. ECFVX (24.90).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.07 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.040 | 9.416 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.6M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.99 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.43 | 8.96 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.40 | 32.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.90 | 36.13 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.25 | 90.64 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers