Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ECFVX (74.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (0.99) vs ECFVX (0.27). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ECFVX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). ECFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.37 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. ECFVX (24.70).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.07 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.090 | 8.448 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.99 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.37 | 4.65 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.72 | 34.88 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.70 | 34.68 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | 92.45 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers