Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECGMX vs MWCPX
ECGMX vs MWCPX Comparison
Open Charts ECGMX vs MWCPX
ECGMX vs MWCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECGMX vs. MWCPX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECGMX is a Hold and MWCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECGMX has more cash in the bank: 4.18B vs. MWCPX (2.65B). ECGMX pays higher dividends than MWCPX: ECGMX (5.55) vs MWCPX (4.88). ECGMX was incepted earlier than MWCPX: ECGMX (17 years) vs MWCPX (6 years). ECGMX (2.26) is less costly to investors than MWCPX (0.68). MWCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 254.00 vs. ECGMX (142.00). ECGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWCPX: ECGMX (1000) vs MWCPX (25000000). ECGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.39 vs. MWCPX (3.93). ECGMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. MWCPX (13.35).
| ECGMX | MWCPX | ECGMX / MWCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.68 | 332% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.68 | 332% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.803 | 1.106 | 434% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 25000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 2.65B | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.55 | 4.88 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.39 | 3.93 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.31 | 20.90 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 13.35 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement