Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. ECIFX (1.09B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (2.00) vs ECIFX (0.44). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. ECIFX (5.23). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.85 vs. ECIFX (27.94).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.835 | 14.743 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 2.00 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.23 | 10.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.34 | 48.45 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.94 | 46.85 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.34 | 81.97 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement