Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. ECIFX (1.08B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (2.05) vs ECIFX (0.49). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. ECIFX (5.93). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.98 vs. ECIFX (27.79).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.497 | 13.320 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 2.05 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | 10.64 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.88 | 43.44 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.79 | 44.98 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.24 | 80.99 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement