Ad is loading...
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$11.34
Change-$0.34 (-2.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.54
Change-$0.88 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.03B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 235B vs. ECIFX (1.03B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (2.26) vs ECIFX (0.50). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ECIFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. ECIFX (2.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). ECIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.63 vs. RLBFX (1.68). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.03 vs. ECIFX (41.34).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.30 | 577% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.30 | 577% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.475 | -2.099 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 235B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 2.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.63 | 1.68 | 276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | 9.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.34 | 48.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.03 | 50.46 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...