Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$11.87
Change-$0.16 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets977.67M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.94
Change-$0.40 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.4B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. ECIFX (978M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (2.26) vs ECIFX (0.50). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). ECIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.25 vs. RLBFX (4.59). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.65 vs. ECIFX (29.47).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.478 | 1.988 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 978M | 240B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 2.26 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.25 | 4.59 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.16 | 24.32 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 39.65 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.85 | 54.88 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement