Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. ECIFX (1.09B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (1.97) vs ECIFX (0.44). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. ECIFX (3.32). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. ECIFX (22.56).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 14.331 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.97 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 9.32 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.96 | 42.18 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.56 | 40.53 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.16 | 74.39 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement