It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECPG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPRO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ECPG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -4.88% price change this week, while LPRO (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.52%.
ECPG is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
LPRO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
ECPG | LPRO | ECPG / LPRO | |
Capitalization | 1.07B | 744M | 144% |
EBITDA | 47.7M | 40.7M | 117% |
Gain YTD | -7.724 | -31.022 | 25% |
P/E Ratio | 113.64 | 33.11 | 343% |
Revenue | 1.22B | 117M | 1,045% |
Total Cash | 158M | 240M | 66% |
Total Debt | 3.32B | 148M | 2,242% |
ECPG | LPRO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECPG's Valuation (77) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LPRO (92) in the null industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPRO (100) in the null industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
LPRO's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as ECPG (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LPRO’s stock grew similarly to ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LPRO (60) in the null industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LPRO (4) in the null industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG | LPRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago70% | 5 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 1 day ago80% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SDGZX | 123.98 | 1.47 | +1.20% |
DWS Capital Growth R6 | |||
MLGRX | 7.88 | 0.07 | +0.90% |
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R3 | |||
FMEUX | 23.91 | 0.06 | +0.27% |
Franklin Mutual International Value R6 | |||
MEQFX | 20.00 | N/A | N/A |
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select I | |||
FRMPX | 26.91 | N/A | N/A |
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opp A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been closely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECPG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ECPG | 100% | -1.22% | ||
PRAA - ECPG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
ENVA - ECPG | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
SLM - ECPG | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
COOP - ECPG | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
OMF - ECPG | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPRO has been loosely correlated with LC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPRO jumps, then LC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LPRO | 100% | -0.34% | ||
LC - LPRO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
GDOT - LPRO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
NNI - LPRO | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
UPBD - LPRO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
ASHTY - LPRO | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More |