Advertisement
ECPG vs QCON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECPG is a Hold and QCON is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ECPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECPG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ECPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ECPG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.35% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECPG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.32% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
ECPG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ECPG | QCON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 17 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 59% |
Advertisement
ECPG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been loosely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECPG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECPG | 100% | +3.11% | ||
| PRAA - ECPG | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| NAVI - ECPG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| ENVA - ECPG | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| OMF - ECPG | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| AXP - ECPG | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||
QCON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QCON and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCON and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCON | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| ECPG - QCON | 16% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
| PCG - QCON | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
| GTLS - QCON | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.30% | ||
| VIAV - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| AEP - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||