ECPG
Price
$85.90
Change
+$1.95 (+2.32%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.84B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VSTS
Price
$13.20
Change
+$0.09 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.74B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECPG vs VSTS

ECPG vs VSTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECPG vs. VSTS commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECPG is a Buy and VSTS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ECPG: $85.81 vs. VSTS: $13.20)
Brand notoriety: ECPG and VSTS are both not notable
ECPG represents the Savings Banks, while VSTS is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECPG: 96% vs. VSTS: 86%
Market capitalization -- ECPG: $1.84B vs. VSTS: $1.74B
ECPG [@Savings Banks] is valued at $1.84B. VSTS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $624.68B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $66.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $30.96B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVSTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VSTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECPG is a better buy in the long-term than VSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECPG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VSTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECPG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VSTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECPG is a better buy in the short-term than VSTS.

Price Growth

ECPG (@Savings Banks) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while VSTS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECPG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

VSTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.11% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.41% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECPG($1.84B) has a higher market cap than VSTS($1.74B). VSTS has higher P/E ratio than ECPG: VSTS (111.00) vs ECPG (6.54). VSTS YTD gains are higher at: 97.901 vs. ECPG (57.884). ECPG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 700M vs. VSTS (212M). ECPG has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. VSTS (50.3M). VSTS has less debt than ECPG: VSTS (1.38B) vs ECPG (4.03B). VSTS has higher revenues than ECPG: VSTS (2.71B) vs ECPG (1.85B).
ECPGVSTSECPG / VSTS
Capitalization1.84B1.74B106%
EBITDA700M212M330%
Gain YTD57.88497.90159%
P/E Ratio6.54111.006%
Revenue1.85B2.71B68%
Total Cash227M50.3M451%
Total Debt4.03B1.38B293%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECPG: Fundamental Ratings
ECPG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECPGVSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VSTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDUR95.420.11
+0.12%
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF
GBND50.430.04
+0.09%
Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
TYLD25.25N/A
N/A
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
WOOD66.15-0.96
-1.42%
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
QXQ31.83-0.96
-2.94%
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF

ECPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been loosely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECPG
1D Price
Change %
ECPG100%
+2.22%
PRAA - ECPG
57%
Loosely correlated
+11.03%
UHAL - ECPG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
HRI - ECPG
49%
Loosely correlated
-6.61%
R - ECPG
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
URI - ECPG
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
More

VSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VSTS has been loosely correlated with PMTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VSTS jumps, then PMTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VSTS
1D Price
Change %
VSTS100%
+0.69%
PMTS - VSTS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
AXP - VSTS
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ENVA - VSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
OMF - VSTS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
ECPG - VSTS
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More