ECRAF
Price
$1.10
Change
+$0.01 (+0.92%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
265.36M
SGML
Price
$7.03
Change
-$0.17 (-2.36%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
781.59M
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECRAF vs SGML

Header iconECRAF vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts ECRAF vs SGMLBanner chart's image
ECORA RESOURCES
Price$1.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.92%)
Volume$42.51K
Capitalization265.36M
Sigma Lithium
Price$7.03
Change-$0.17 (-2.36%)
Volume$3.09M
Capitalization781.59M
ECRAF vs SGML Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECRAF vs. SGML commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECRAF is a Hold and SGML is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ECRAF: $1.10 vs. SGML: $7.03)
Brand notoriety: ECRAF and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECRAF: 130% vs. SGML: 106%
Market capitalization -- ECRAF: $265.36M vs. SGML: $781.59M
ECRAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $265.36M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $781.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECRAF is a better buy in the long-term than SGML.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECRAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECRAF is a better buy in the short-term than SGML.

Price Growth

ECRAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.48% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +320.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGML is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($782M) has a higher market cap than ECRAF($265M). SGML has higher P/E ratio than ECRAF: SGML (120.72) vs ECRAF (11.23). ECRAF YTD gains are higher at: 31.046 vs. SGML (-37.344). ECRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.81M vs. SGML (-16.61M). SGML has more cash in the bank: 31.1M vs. ECRAF (7.94M). ECRAF has less debt than SGML: ECRAF (136M) vs SGML (172M). SGML has higher revenues than ECRAF: SGML (127M) vs ECRAF (26M).
ECRAFSGMLECRAF / SGML
Capitalization265M782M34%
EBITDA-4.81M-16.61M29%
Gain YTD31.046-37.344-83%
P/E Ratio11.23120.729%
Revenue26M127M20%
Total Cash7.94M31.1M26%
Total Debt136M172M79%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECRAF vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
ECRAF
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10019
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRAF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGML (89). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as ECRAF (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (97). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SGML (54). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECRAF (100). This means that SGML’s stock grew significantly faster than ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECRAFSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREEX26.300.27
+1.04%
American Century Real Estate A
JDIVX17.100.14
+0.83%
JHancock Disciplined Value Intl NAV
VYSDX11.200.08
+0.72%
Voya Small Company R
DSPIX57.690.34
+0.59%
BNY Mellon Instl S&P 500 Stk Idx I
ELMFX19.56-0.15
-0.76%
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity F

ECRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRAF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRAF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRAF
1D Price
Change %
ECRAF100%
+0.92%
TMQ - ECRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
SGML - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
RIO - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
UURAF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
NBMFF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
-2.36%
LAR - SGML
55%
Loosely correlated
-7.81%
BHP - SGML
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
VALE - SGML
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
LAC - SGML
45%
Loosely correlated
-14.11%
PILBF - SGML
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
More