Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECSMX vs NRGEX
ECSMX vs NRGEX Comparison
Open Charts ECSMX vs NRGEX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
Price$11.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.69M
Neuberger Berman Genesis E
Price$65.90
Change-$0.18 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.3B
ECSMX vs NRGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGEX has more cash in the bank: 9.3B vs. ECSMX (180M). NRGEX pays higher dividends than ECSMX: NRGEX (0.54) vs ECSMX (0.00). ECSMX was incepted earlier than NRGEX: ECSMX (23 years) vs NRGEX (4 years). ECSMX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NRGEX (0.69). ECSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NRGEX (13.00). NRGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECSMX: NRGEX (0) vs ECSMX (1000). ECSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.35 vs. NRGEX (-1.17).
| ECSMX | NRGEX | ECSMX / NRGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.03 | 6,533% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.69 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.530 | 0.855 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 9.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.35 | -1.17 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.22 | 7.85 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.24 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement